More interestingly, Things is now able to capture tasks by voice using the improved SiriKit, and you can dictate almost all metadata to it. Things offers a pretty standard task entry system, including a system-wide Quick Entry dialog, but it also has a few tricks up its sleeve.įrom Safari, Mail, or Finder, you can use Quick Entry With Autofill to capture selected text, or create a task that automatically has a link to the relevant email or file attached to it. My entire day - events and tasks alike - is visible at a glance from a single app. Since I spend the vast majority of my time in the Today view, the fact that Things displays my calendar events there is a boon. Rather than feeling like a system, a mechanism, Things feels like a friendly, relatable companion. Things lets you segregate tasks within your day simply as “Today” or “This Evening.” Work stuff probably needs to get done during the day (Today), whereas chores and optional things can generally be relegated to This Evening. There’s also the way in which Things handles priorities. New tasks are highlighted at the beginning of each day, but you’re not punished for not making it through everything. My favorite example of this is the fact that overdue tasks don’t need to be manually re-scheduled - they just stay in your Today view. Even small details of semantics reveal a thoughtful understanding of how people actually tackle their tasks in the real world. With that out of the way, I want to unpack some of the inner beauty by mentioning what I’ve come to think of as its “human” nature. If you have no deleted tasks, you don’t see the trash bin.
Things is wise about scaling the complexity of its interface, only ever showing you what’s relevant to your usage if you don’t use tags, the tag navigation isn’t shown to you. It’s clean without being sparse, delightful without being showy, and organized without being rigid.
It feels comfortable, inviting, and alive in a way that’s utterly engrossing. While there are many things to love about the app, these are the aspects that had the most impact on my usage. In functional terms, Things 3 is a measured re-thinking: it doesn’t fix what wasn’t broken, but streamlines and builds upon previous versions. Since the earliest days of the App Store, Things has made a name for itself as one of the most beautiful, effective task management apps on the market. The goal is to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each in a way that makes it clear which is the best fit for your needs. What follows is not an attempt to crown a winner - it’s an examination of how these equally-compelling apps compare in long-term use. The only way to properly assess these options is to dive in and spend a long time using them they need to flex to accommodate both the busiest and calmest times in my life. Some are heavily focused on a particular methodology such as GTD, while others cast a wider net, catering to all sorts of workflows.įrom that vast array of options, I keep coming back to a stalwart few that have proven themselves to be capable, thoughtful, and genuinely helpful in the pursuit of a more productive, organized life: Things, OmniFocus, and Todoist. Over the years, we’ve seen multiple apps emerge to tackle this problem. Thus, we wanted to put together this comparison show how Things compares to OmniFocus compares to Todoist.įrom Left to Right: Things, OmniFocus, Todoist It’s remarkable how much nuance exists within the concept of task management. And, with so many excellent task management apps to choose from, it can be difficult to know which one is right for you if you are still on the fence one way or another. But we know that different people have different needs and preferences. In another article, we have already written about how we believe Things is the best productivity and task management app. Here is a comparison of the top three productivity apps (Things vs OmniFocus vs Todoist) to help you decide which is the best fit.
0 kommentar(er)
